Rituximab has been shown to prolong survival when used therapeutically with chemotherapy in CLL. This Rituximab, the mAb targeting CD20, was approved by the US FDA for patients with relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Relatively low levels of CD20 are expressed on CLL B cells, compared to normal B or neoplastic B cells of other lymphomas. In addition, soluble CD20 has been demonstrated in plasma of patients with CLL; this may inhibit the capacity of rituximab to bind to CLL B cells, thereby resulting in rapid clearance and negatively affecting pharmacokinetics. Standard-dose rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks) has very limited activity for patients with CLL. Dose-intense and dose-dense single-agent rituximab has been shown to increase efficacy but remains experimental. Rituxan at standard dose is listed by NCCN as a single agent only for frail patients who cannot tolerate other treatments. A 2005 guideline (Imre et al) says: "There is currently insufficient evidence to support or refute the additional use of rituximab as a maintenance therapy in patients who have completed chemotherapy plus rituximab." However, NCCN doest list it as a single agent for the elderly.A recent guideline (Imre et al) says: "There is currently insufficient evidence to support or refute the additional use of rituximab as a maintenance therapy in patients who have completed chemotherapy plus rituximab."
Since this guideline, additional evidence has accrued to support rituximab for maintenance in CLL. The strongest evidence in support of it was the Primary Rituximab and Maintenance (PRIMA) Study, in which patients received immunochemotherapy. Those who did not fail were randomly assigned to maintenance or observation. There was a longer progression-free survival in those who received rituximab maintenance, but no survival benefit. There also was the Ardeshna study, in which patients who could be observed were either randomly assigned to the watch-and-wait approach or to rituximab induction and maintenance. Time to requiring next treatment was longer if you got rituximab, but there was no survival benefit.
Currently(2012) are no guidelines that recommend maintenance rituximab.
The IMiDs, thalidomide and lenalidomide, have also been investigated as maintenance treatment in CLL. Lenalidomide might have some validity as maintenance treatment and clinical trials of lenalidomide in maintenance treatment have been initiated.
Imrie K, Stevens A, Meyer R, Hematology Disease Site Group. Rituximab in lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2005 Dec 22. 46 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 6-8). [65 references]
Kahl BS, Hong F, Williams ME, et al. Results of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Protocol E4402 (RESORT): A randomized phase III study comparing two different rituximab dosing strategies for low tumor burden follicular lymphoma. Program and abstracts of the 53rd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 10-13, 2011; San Diego, California. Abstract LBA-6.
Salles G, Seymour JF, Offner F, et al. Rituximab maintenance for 2 years in patients with high tumour burden follicular lymphoma responding to rituximab plus chemotherapy (PRIMA): a phase 3, randomised controlled. Lancet. 2011;377:42-51. Abstract
Ardeshna KM, Qian W, Smith P, et al. An intergroup randomised trial of rituximab versus a watch and wait strategy in patients with stage II, III, IV, asymptomatic, non-bulky follicular lymphoma (grades 1, 2 and 3a): a preliminary analysis. Program and abstracts of the 52nd American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 4-7, 2010; Orlando, Florida. Abstract 6.
Sher T, Miller KC, Lawrence D, et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with high-risk cytogenetics. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51:85-88.