Gleevec

BCR/ABL monitoring of chronic myelogenous leukemia on Gleevec

There  have been no studies that  demonstrate that followup with BCR/ABL assists with actual clinical management of CML. Chronic myeloid leukemia has become a paradigm for the discovery of target therapeutic approaches in the field of onco-hematology. Recognition of the tyrosine kinase activity of the p210Bcr-Abl oncoprotein led to the development of compounds targeting against BCR-ABL and then controlling the leukemic proliferation. Imatinib mesylate, one of the first tyrosine kinase inhibitors developed, was found effective and safe. According to five-years experience with this drug, it is recommended that the golden standard for initial treatment of newly diagnosis chronic myeloid leukemia patients should be 400 mg Imatinib daily.

It is not clear what the best monitoring stategy of imatinib might be. Some physicians get regular bcr/abl analysis, others only use it for monitoring when Ph chromosome is undetectable. As noted, there is no clear consensus on how to use this test. NCCN does recommedn BCR/ABL every three months.

Gluckman, J. Reiffers, et al.
Imatinib mesylate discontinuation in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete molecular remission for more than 2 years
Blood, January 1, 2007; 109(1): 58 - 60.

J. V. Melo, T. P. Hughes, and J. F. Apperley
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Hematology, January 1, 2003; 2003(1): 132 - 152.

Hematology Disease Site Group. Walker I, Makarski J, Stevens A, Meyer RM. Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2004 Jul 16. 27 p. (Practice guideline report; no. 6-15). [39 references]

http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/chlabs/miscdocuments/CML_Monitoring_Guidelines_Jul%202007.pdf

Gleevec for acute lymphocytic leukemia

Lay Summary: There is now evidence that GLeevec is very effective in Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL.

Philadelphia-positive ALL is a very difficult disease to treat successfully. In the recent past, the standard approach was to use daunorubicin/vincristine/prednisone-based induction therapy to achieve remission and then, if the patient was a reasonable candidate and a donor could be found, to perform an allogeneic transplant. Now, the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy may be altering this strategy. Single-agent treatment with imatinib and probably with dasatinib is fairly likely to achieve hematologic responses, but the likelihood of cytogenetic response is lower.

A study reported by Dr. Kirk Schultz on behalf of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) showed that imatinib mesylate could be given safely in combination with chemotherapy in children with Philadelphia-positive ALL. Patients aged 1-21 with Philadelphia-positive ALL who achieved remission with standard COG induction therapy received an intensive multidrug combination chemotherapy regimen, with introduction of imatinib at 340 mg/m2 for 21 days into an increasing number of treatment blocks in successive cohorts of patients. Patients receiving imatinib had a higher incidence of transaminase elevation in first consolidation and maintenance. However, there were few significant additional increased toxicities compared with historical and contemporaneous controls not receiving imatinib. This appeared to be a feasible combination of a targeted therapy with chemotherapy and will be explored further in subsequent trials.

Dr. Deborah Thomas, a pioneer in the use of imatinib mesylate and chemotherapy in adults with Philadelphia-positive ALL,[11] presented her most recent data at ASH 2007. This is the  Phase II Pilot Study of Intensified Chemotherapy With or Without Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Very High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. The chemotherapy backbone was the MD Anderson standard of hyper-CVAD, which is fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate and high-dose ara-C. Although a high rate of remission was achieved historically with the use of this regimen in patients with Philadelphia-positive ALL, disease-free survival was brief. Dr. Thomas and colleagues added imatinib at 400 mg per day on days 1 through 14 to each of 8 courses followed by 12 months of imatinib. In later iterations of her work, imatinib was increased to 600 mg per day on days 1 through 14 for courses 1 through 8, with imatinib being given indefinitely after maintenance was completed. Overall, 52 patients with imatinib-naive or minimally treated Philadelphia-positive ALL received therapy from April 2001 to July 2006. With a 3-year treatment follow-up, there were only 7 relapses (14%); however, 12 patients died. The 3-year remission and disease-free survival rates for the combination compared favorably with hyper-CVAD alone (83% vs 24%, and 55% vs 14%, respectively).
  1. Schultz KR, Aledo A, Bowman WP, et al. Minimal toxicity of imatinib mesylate in combination with intensive chemotherapy for Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children: a report of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL0031 protocol for very high risk ALL. Blood. 2006;108:87a. Abstract 283.
  2. Thomas DA, Faderl S, Cortes J, et al. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate. Blood. 2004;103:4396-4407
  3. Oliver G. Ottmann and Barbara Wassmann Treatment of Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia  ASH Hematology 2005

    © 2005 The American Society of Hematology

Google Ads

Photo Albums

Google

  • Safe Search
    Google

Resources:

Categories